Ocular syphilis: a case report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i6.13882Keywords:
Primary health care, Case report, Secondary syphilisAbstract
Introduction: Since the year 2000, the incidence of syphilis has increased, currently representing an important public health problem. Ocular syphilis can occur at any stage of the disease, with manifestations in different parts of the eye. This clinical case highlights the importance of primary healthcare in addressing the disease and subsequent collaboration with other specialties.
Case description: I.B., 63-year-old female patient. Personal history of depression, epilepsy, high blood pressure, deafness, smoking, ischemic heart disease, and a poor economic environment. The patient visited her health center in January 2023 for a consultation due to persistent complaints of redness and discomfort in her left eye, which had not responded to topical agents. She presented with scleral inflammation, with great vascular congestion and diffuse hyperemia. Since the symptoms persisted regardless of the medication and considering her personal history, it was imperative to conduct a deeper and broader investigation for systemic causes. One month later, several circular lesions were identified on the hands and two on the perineum area, concurrent with positivity for syphilis. She was referred to an Ophthalmology and Infectious Diseases consultation and was diagnosed with syphilitic panuveitis. She started treatment with intravenous penicillin for 14 days. Lumbar puncture and brain MRI were performed to detect neurosyphilis, both without alterations. The post-therapeutic RPR indicated a 4-fold reduction in the pre-therapeutic titration value, synonymous with success.
Comment: This case of syphilis, considered by many authors to be the great imitator, demonstrates the importance of the holistic approach of the family doctor. In addition to being the first to observe the initial symptoms of disease, often non-specific, he can integrate with the personal and family background, which, combined with a high degree of suspicion, contributes to the diagnosis.
Downloads
References
1. Tripathy DM, Gupta S, Vasudevan B. Resurgence of syphilis, the great imitator. Med J Armed Forces India. 2022;78(2):131-5.
2. Lee SY, Cheng V, Rodger D, Rao N. Clinical and laboratory characteristics of ocular syphilis: a new face in the era of HIV co-infection. J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2015;5(1):56.
3. Mathew RG, Goh BT, Westcott MC. British Ocular Syphilis Study (BOSS): 2-year national surveillance study of intraocular inflammation secondary to ocular syphilis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(8):5394-400.
4. Rowley J, Vander Hoorn S, Korenromp E, Low N, Unemo M, Abu-Raddad LJ, et al. Chlamydia, gonorrhoea, trichomoniasis and syphilis: global prevalence and incidence estimates, 2016. Bull World Health Organ. 2019;97(8):548-62P.
5. Klausner JD. The great imitator revealed: syphilis. Top Antivir Med. 2019;27(2):71-4.
6. Whiting C, Schwartzman G, Khachemoune A. Syphilis in dermatology: recognition and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2023;24(2):287-97.
7. Furtado JM, Simões M, Vasconcelos-Santos D, Oliver GF, Tyagi M, Nascimento H, et al. Ocular syphilis. Surv Ophthalmol. 2022;67(2):440-62.
8. Wells J, Wood C, Sukthankar A, Jones NP. Ocular syphilis: the re-establishment of an old disease. Eye (Lond). 2018;32(1):99-103.
9. Etheridge T, Bowen RC, Raven M, Snow KB, Urban AW, Chang JS. Ocular syphilis: clinical manifestations and treatment course. WMJ. 2019;118(4):191-5.
10. Teixeira AM, Meireles E, Pereira Fontes C, Manuel M. Ocular syphilis: a case report. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23509.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.