Second-hand smoke and health
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i2.10232Keywords:
Smoking, Environmental Tobacco, RiskAbstract
Introduction: Tobacco smoke is the main and most widespread pollutant in the middle and inner touted its safety is fully refuted by extensive scientific evidence available, and the risks that could be prevented full. Objectives: To review the available knowledge on indoor air quality and health risks. Methods: This is a review article that includes the following components: 1) Exposure to Environmental Tobacco, 2) risk assessment, 3) implications for health policy, 4) Implications for health professionals. Results: A child whose mother smokes has a 70% increased likelihood of suffering from respiratory problems, which is 30% probability that the parent is a smoker. Who never smoked have a 24% increased risk of getting lung cancer if you live with a smoker, this being 30% risk for ischemic heart disease. Conclusions: The FA is not likely to be controlled to levels of 'acceptable risk' to carcinogens in the air, either by dilution by ventilation or air cleaning. The IARC has classified "complex mix" that makes tobacco smoke as a carcinogen (Group 1). An effective health policy based on solid scientific evidence is not built solely on legislative measures. Healthcare professionals compete actively contribute to the necessary change of culture and behavior and act in accordance with the 'state of art'.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.