Contraception and risk of venous thromboembolism: a case-control study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v30i5.11386Keywords:
Combined Oral Contraceptives, Progestins, Venous ThromboembolismAbstract
Objectives: To compare the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) among users of fourth generation oral contraceptives and previous generations of combined oral contraceptives (COC), and to analyze the possible correlations between age, body mass index (BMI) and duration of COC use and the risk of VTE. Study design: Case-control study. Setting: Centro Hospitalar do Alto-Ave, Hospital de Braga and Unidade Local de Saúde do Alto Minho. Participants: A sample of 257 women was analyzed, including 122 with a previous history of VTE and 135 without a history of VTE. Methods: The medical records of women with a history of VTE, which occurred between 2010 and 2013, were reviewed. Women of using COC at the time of the VTE were identified as cases. The controls were women using COC followed in a family planning clinic, without a history of VTE. Results: Fourth generation COC do not increase the risk of VTE compared to older COC (OR = 1.77; IC95 0.93-3.38; p = 0.083). There was no correlation between BMI and the risk of VTE (OR = 1.53; IC95 0.76-3.06; p = 0.234). Age (OR = 1.5; IC95 1.02-1.09; p = 0.001) and duration of COC use (OR = 2.41; IC95 1.19-4.87; p = 0.014) were associated with VTE. Conclusions: The risk of VTE depends on age and duration of COC use. Due to limitations of the study, the finding of relative safety of fourth generation COC for the risk of VTE compared to older contraceptives must be interpreted with cautionDownloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.