Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: the end of the line for standard triple therapy?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v31i6.11624Keywords:
Helicobacter pylori, Drug Therapy, Disease EradicationAbstract
Objectives: To review the evidence for the effectiveness of triple therapy (TT) and sequential therapy (TS) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection (H. pylori). Data sources: MEDLINE and evidence-based medicine websites. Methods: We conducted a search for clinical practice guidelines (CPG), systematic reviews (SR), meta-analyses (MA) and randomized clinical trials (RCT), published between June, 2004 and June, 2014, using the MeSH terms ‘Helicobacter pylori’, ‘Drug therapy’ and ‘Disease eradication’. The Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy (SORT) was used for the assignment of levels of evidence and the strength of recommendations. Results: A total of 15 articles were selected out of 227 articles found. These included 3 CPG, 8 MA, 2 RS and 2 RCT. The CPG recommend TT as the preferred treatment. The 8 MA and 2 RS showed the superiority of ST in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (ranging from 81 to 95.6%) compared to the TT (for 7-10 days, consistently <80%). The 2 EAC had overlapping findings with the MA and RS. Conclusions: TS has superior efficacy compared to TT and should be considered as the first line of therapy for eradication of H. pylori infection (SOR A). When compared to TT for 14 days, conventional TS appears to have a similar rate of eradication. When given for more 14 days, TS is better than TT (SOR B). In areas of high resistance to clarithromycin, metronidazole or both, as in Portugal, TS is better than TT (SOR A).Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.