Evaluation of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship in the Northeast of Portugal

Authors

  • Joana Gomes da Silva Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste - UCSP Mirandela II http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0257-3593
  • Ana Sofia Rodrigues Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. UCSP Miranda do Douro, ULS do Nordeste. Miranda do Douro, Portugal.
  • Bárbara Alexandre Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. UCSP Mirandela II, ULS do Nordeste. Mirandela, Portugal.
  • Fátima Monteiro Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. UCSP Torre de Moncorvo, ULS do Nordeste. Torre de Moncorvo, Portugal.
  • Karolina Mohosh Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. UCSP Miranda do Douro, ULS do Nordeste. Miranda do Douro, Portugal.
  • Sara Carlos Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. UCSP Sé, ULS do Nordeste. Bragança, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i3.13490

Keywords:

Empathy, Doctor-patient relationship, Communication in health care practice, Holistic approach, Family doctor

Abstract

Introduction: The family doctor develops a person-centered approach, oriented toward the individual, the family, and the community in which he is inserted, with empathy being the major key to this relationship.

Objectives: Understand the doctor-patient relationship in the context of primary health care (PHC) in the Northeast of Portugal.

Methods: A descriptive study was carried out with a sample of PHC. Demographic data (biological sex-binary classification, age, county of residence, and education), questions about the perception of PHC, and the application of the Jefferson Empathy Scale (JSPPPE-VP) were collected through an online platform with the dissemination of information through social media and physical format in PHC of the Unidade Local de Saúde do Nordeste. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS® Statistics software.

Results: The sample consisted of 584 individuals (median age: 45 years old), mostly women (67.47%), with an undergraduate level of education (57.71%). Most people (75.51%) say that their family doctor is the first person that they turn to when they have a health problem because they believe he has the necessary skills to better manage their health problems (69.52%). In terms of accessibility, 61.30% and 60.96% respectively consider that it is easy to get an appointment and to clarify specific doubts. Of the respondents, 22.95% did not agree with the average duration of consultations (20 minutes), preferring 30 minutes. When the JSPPE-VP was applied, approximately 50.00% of the respondents indicated that they strongly or completely agreed with all the items evaluated.

Conclusions: The sample obtained showed overall satisfaction with the provision, accessibility, and quality of services, as well as the duration of the consultation. It can also be concluded that there is a high level of satisfaction with the empathy of the family doctor.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Cuidados de saúde primários [homepage]. Geneva: WHO; 2023 Nov 15. Available from: https://www.who.int/world-health-day/world-health-day-2019/fact-sheets/details/primary-health-care

Ordem dos Médicos. Perfil de competências do especialista em medicina geral e familiar [homepage]. Lisboa: OM; 2019 Aug 28 [cited 2021 Mar 21]. Available from: https://ordemdosmedicos.pt/perfil-de-competencias-do-especialista-em-medicina-geral-e-familiar/

Santos P, Sá AB, Santiago L, Hespanhol A. A árvore da WONCA: tradução e adaptação cultural para português [The WONCA tree: Portuguese translation and cultural adaptation]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2021;37(1):28-35. Portuguese

Borrell-Carrió F, Suchman AL, Epstein RM. The biopsychosocial model 25 years later: principles, practice and scientific inquiry. Ann Fam Med. 2004;2(6):576-82.

Derksen F, Bensing J, Lagro-Janssen A. Effectiveness of empathy in general practice: a systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63(606):e76-84.

Frankenhaeuser M. A biopsychosocial approach to work life issues. Int J Health Serv. 1989;19(4);747-58.

Pagé MG, Fortier M, Ware MA, Choinière M. As if one pain problem was not enough: prevalence and patterns of coexisting chronic conditions and their impact on treatment options. J Pain Res. 2018;11:237-54.

Gagliese L, Gauthier LR, Narain N, Freedman T. Pain, aging and dementia: towards a biopsychosocial model. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2018;87(Pt B):207-15.

Cardoso RM. Competências clínicas de comunicação. Porto: Afrontamento; 2018. ISBN 9789899795303

Duff-Brown B. How growing time constrains impact primary care physicians and patients [homepage]. Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies of the Stanford University; 2018 Sep 19 [cited 2021 Mar 18]. Available from: https://fsi.stanford.edu/news/how-growing-time-constrains-impact-primary-care-physicians-and-patients

Nunes JM. A comunicação em contexto clínico. Lisboa: [s.n.]; 2010.

Fiscella K, Epstein RM. So much to do, so little time: care for the disadvantaged and the 15-minute visit. Arch Intern Med. 2008;168(17):1843-52.

Macedo A, Cavadas LF, Sousa M, Pires P, Santos JA, Machado A. Empathy in family medicine. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2011;27(6):527-32.

Roque H, Veloso A, Ferreira PL. Versão portuguesa do questionário EUROPEP: contributos para a validação psicométrica [Portuguese version of the EUROPEP questionnaire: contributions to the psychometric validation]. Rev Saúde Pública. 2016;50:61. Portuguese

Surbakti EF, Sari K. The relationship between consultation length and patient satisfaction: a systematic review. In: The 2nd International Conference on Hospital Administration, KnE Life Sciences. 2018;2018:41-9.

Oxtoby K. Consultation times. BMJ. 2010;340:c2554.

Simões JA, Prazeres F, Maricoto T, Simões PA, Lourenço J, Romano JP, et al. Physician empathy and patient enablement: survey in the Portuguese primary health care. Fam Pract. 2021;38(5):606-11.

Published

2024-07-08

How to Cite

Evaluation of the quality of the doctor-patient relationship in the Northeast of Portugal. (2024). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 40(3), 259-67. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i3.13490