The importance of continuity of care in psychiatric pathology: a case report

Authors

  • Filipa Canha Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Rita Pitta Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal.
  • Margarida Esteves Nunes Gil Conde Médica Especialista de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal. Clínica Universitária de Medicina Geral e Familiar, Instituto de Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. Secção de Investigação, Comissão de Ética para a Saúde, ARSLVT. Lisboa, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i4.13698

Keywords:

Psychotic disorders, Depression, Judicial decisions, Case report

Abstract

Introduction: Primary health care (PHC) workers are responsible for diagnosing and treating psychiatric disorders, as well as referring some instances to secondary care. The Mental Health Law (Law no. 36/98) sets out the principles for mental health policy and regulates the involuntary hospitalization of people with mental illness. It is the responsibility of the family physician to identify such situations and activate the “emergency assessment warrant”.

Case description: The case concerns a 50-year-old female patient with a history of attempted suicide and followed up in psychiatry. In a scheduled psychiatry appointment, the patient reported anxiety and night-time agitation, and therapeutic adjustment was made with subsequent reevaluation. Due to persistent symptoms, the therapeutic plan was adjusted again. Later, she sought care from her family physician reporting noncompliance with treatment and worsening symptoms of irritability and auditory hallucinations in the form of a single voice with instructions for self- and hetero-aggressive acts. The patient was referred to the emergency department, evaluated, and received a new therapeutic adjustment and a recommendation for an earlier psychiatry appointment for reassessment. In a subsequent appointment with the family physician, it was identified suicidal ideation, self- and hetero-aggression, and acoustic-verbal pseudo hallucinations, and a new visit to the emergency department was proposed, which the patient refused. Given the context, the family physician activated the “Mandado de Condução à Urgência” which the patient understood and accepted. During hospitalization, a new therapeutic plan was implemented, resulting in remission of self and hetero-aggressive ideation and auditory pseudo hallucinations, as well as improvement in mood and reduction of anhedonia and depressive cognitions.

Comments: This clinical case represents shared management of patients with psychiatric illness between PHC and psychiatry, as well as the importance of monitoring therapeutic response, reinforcing the need for improved coordination among various levels of care to ensure more effective information sharing and better care for patients with psychiatric disorders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Filipa Canha, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal.

    Interna da Formação Geral

  • Rita Pitta, Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal.

    Interna da Formação Específica em Medicina Geral e Familiar

  • Margarida Esteves Nunes Gil Conde, Médica Especialista de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central. Lisboa, Portugal. Clínica Universitária de Medicina Geral e Familiar, Instituto de Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa. Lisboa, Portugal. Secção de Investigação, Comissão de Ética para a Saúde, ARSLVT. Lisboa, Portugal.

    Especialista em Medicina Geral e Familiar, USF Jardins da Encarnação, ACeS Lisboa Central, ARSLVT;
    Clínica Universitária de Medicina Geral e Familiar, Instituto de Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Pública, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa; 
    Comissão de Ética para a Saúde, Secção de Investigação, ARSLVT;
    ORCID: 0000-0001-9367-5899, www.linkedin.com/in/margarida-gil-conde-09415b124

References

Programa Nacional para a Saúde Mental. Programa nacional para a saúde mental 2017. Lisboa: Direção-Geral da Saúde; 2017.

Almeida TC, Heitor MJ, Santos O, Costa A, Virgolino A, Rasga C, et al. Saúde mental em tempos de pandemia – SM-COVID19: relatório final [Internet]. Lisboa: Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge; 2020. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/7245

Lei nº 36/98, de 24 de julho. Diário da República. I Série-A;(169).

Direção-Geral da Saúde. Terapêutica farmacológica da depressão major e da sua recorrência no adulto: norma nº 034/2012, de 30/12/2012. Lisboa: DGS; 2012.

Kripalani S, LeFevre F, Phillips CO, Williams MV, Basaviah P, Baker DW. Deficits in communication and information transfer between hospital-based and primary care physicians: Implications for patient safety and continuity of care. JAMA. 2007;297(8):831-41.

Durbin J, Barnsley J, Finlayson B, Jaakkimainen L, Lin E, Berta W, et al. Quality of communication between primary health care and mental health care: an examination of referral and discharge letters. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2012;39(4):445-61.

Decreto-Lei n.º 113/2021, de 14 de dezembro. Diário da República. I Série;(240).

Published

2023-09-14

How to Cite

The importance of continuity of care in psychiatric pathology: a case report. (2023). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 39(4), 327-31. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i4.13698