Genitourinary tract infections and SGLT2 inhibitors: a case-control study in a primary care center

Authors

  • Nina Lopes USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental. Porto, Portugal.
  • Sofia Baptista MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto, Portugal | INTESIS@RISE - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto, Portugal.
  • Andreia Teixeira MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Decision in Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto, Portugal | CINTESIS@RISE - Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto. Porto, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13850

Keywords:

Diabetes mellitus, SGLT2 inhibitor, Urinary tract infection, Genital infections, Case-control

Abstract

Introduction: Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitor (iSGLT2) drugs are being increasingly used in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2), due to their benefit in chronic kidney disease and heart failure – frequent comorbidities in patients with DM2. Evidence has been found linking iSGLT2 usage to an increased risk of genital infections. Regarding iSGLT2’s association with urinary tract infections (UTI), the findings are inconsistent.

Aim: Determine in a sample taken from a primary care center, to determine whether DM2 patients treated with iSGLT2 are at an increased risk of UTI and genital infections when compared to DM2 patients treated only with other antidiabetic drugs.

Methods: A case-control study, of a population of DM2 patients from a primary care center in the north of Portugal. Records from the year 2021 of cystitis, pyelonephritis/pyelitis, balanitis, prostatitis, vaginitis, candidiasis, and trichomoniasis, of iSGLT2 medicated DM2 patients were compared to those without this treatment (group variable: case with iSGLT2 vs control without iSGLT2). Logistic regression models were utilized to derive the association between iSGLT2 usage and previously mentioned infections.

Results: Final sample: 953 patients. The group iSGLT2 was protective of the outcome cystitis, with an OR=0.47 [0.24; 0.90]. After adjusting for potential confounding factors this association was no longer significant – OR=0.54 [0.27; 1.07]. There was no significant association found between iSGLT2 usage and pyelonephritis/pyelitis, balanitis, prostatitis, vaginitis, candidiasis, and trichomoniasis.

Conclusion:  The present study seems to favor iSGLT2 safety regarding urinary and genital infections that may limit the prescription of these drugs.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, Huang Y, Fernandes JD, Ohlrogge AW, et al. IDF diabetes atlas: global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138:271-81.

Barreto M, Kislaya I, Gaio V, Rodrigues AP, Santos AJ, Namorado S, et al. Prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of diabetes in Portugal: results from the first National Health Examination Survey (INSEF 2015). Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;140:271-8.

ElSayed NA, Aleppo G, Aroda VR, Bannuru RR, Brown FM, Bruemmer D, et al. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: standards of care in diabetes-2023. Diabetes Care. 2023;46(Suppl 1):S140-57.

Wanner C, Inzucchi SE, Lachin JM, Fitchett D, von Eynatten M, Mattheus M, et al. Empagliflozin and progression of kidney disease in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(4):323-34.

Kohan DE, Fioretto P, Johnsson K, Parikh S, Ptaszynska A, Ying L. The effect of dapagliflozin on renal function in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Nephrol. 2016;29(3):391-400.

Verma S. The DAPA-HF trial marks the beginning of a new era in the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Cardiovasc Res. 2020;116(1):e8-10.

Docherty KF, Jhund PS, Inzucchi SE, Køber L, Kosiborod MN, Martinez FA, et al. Effects of dapagliflozin in DAPA-HF according to background heart failure therapy. Eur Heart J. 2020;41(25):2379-92.

Li D, Wang T, Shen S, Fang Z, Dong Y, Tang H. Urinary tract and genital infections in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017;19(3):348-55.

Vallon V. The mechanisms and therapeutic potential of SGLT2 inhibitors in diabetes mellitus. Annu Rev Med. 2015;66:255-70.

Chao EC, Henry RR. SGLT2 inhibition: a novel strategy for diabetes treatment. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2010;9(7):551-9.

Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Patorno E. Comparative risk of genital infections associated with sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(2):434-8.

Puckrin R, Saltiel MP, Reynier P, Azoulay L, Yu OH, Filion KB. SGLT-2 inhibitors and the risk of infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Acta Diabetol. 2018;55(5):503-14.

Wu JH, Foote C, Blomster J, Toyama T, Perkovic V, Sundström J, et al. Effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, death, and major safety outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016;4(5):411-9.

Direção-Geral da Saúde. Processo assistencial integrado da diabetes mellitus tipo 2: informação nº 001/2013, de 19/02/2013. Lisboa: DGS; 2013.

Cintra R, Moura FA, Carvalho LS, Barreto J, Tambascia M, Pecoits-Filho R, et al. Inhibition of the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 in the elderly: clinical and mechanistic insights into safety and efficacy. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2019;65(1):70-86.

Sarafidis PA, Ortiz A. The risk for urinary tract infections with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors: no longer a cause of concern? Clin Kidney J. 2019;13(1):24-6.

Davies MJ, Aroda VR, Collins BS, Gabbay RA, Green J, Maruthur NM, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2022: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2022;45(11):2753-86.

Dave CV, Schneeweiss S, Kim D, Fralick M, Tong A, Patorno E. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and the risk for severe urinary tract infections: a population-based cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2019;171(4):248-56.

Fisher A, Fralick M, Filion KB, Dell’Aniello S, Douros A, Tremblay É, et al. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors and the risk of urosepsis: a multi-site, prevalent new-user cohort study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2020;22(9):1648-58.

Liu J, Li L, Li S, Jia P, Deng K, Chen W, et al. Effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on UTIs and genital infections in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):2824.

Tsai AG, Bessesen DH. Obesity. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170(5):ITC33-48.

Mascolo A, Di Napoli R, Balzano N, Cappetta D, Urbanek K, De Angelis A, et al. Safety profile of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors: a brief summary. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:1010693.

Published

2024-02-28

How to Cite

Genitourinary tract infections and SGLT2 inhibitors: a case-control study in a primary care center. (2024). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 40(1), 10-6. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i1.13850

Most read articles by the same author(s)