Determining factors in the search for health care at a basic emergency service, by users of a family health unit
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13987Keywords:
Accessibility, Emergency service, Primary health careAbstract
Introduction: Understanding the determinants of the demand for health care will contribute to a better organization of health services and promote an improvement in the quality of service and health professionals' performance.
Objective: Understanding the determining factors in the demand for health care by patients of Family Health Unit (FHU) Novo Norte, particularly when choosing basic emergency service (ES) over primary health care (PHC).
Methods: Cross-sectional, descriptive, and exploratory study, during February/2023, through the application of a questionnaire to patients enrolled at FHU Novo Norte with care at the basic ES/Arouca. After a descriptive analysis, the variables were compared using Fisher's exact test.
Results: There was a predominance of female patients, with an average age of 47.52 years, and professionally active; a greater recurrence of ES during the week and in the morning; a predominance of patients who went to the ES on their initiative, with symptoms appearing in the last three days, and whose main reasons include self-perception of emergency and immediate hospital care. Despite the majority considered knowing the situations in which they should resort to acute consultation (AC), 21% of patients responded inadequately. It was found that 66% did not seek AC. Finally, 61.87% were exempt from moderating fees, which is statistically significantly related to the number of visits to the ES.
Discussion: The FHU Novo Norte and the basic ES/Arouca are located in the same building, so the difficulty in accessing the PHC does not correspond to the only explanatory reason. A misinformed conception of PHC and the care provided remains.
Conclusion: It is essential to educate and raise awareness of the population regarding the importance of primarily resorting to local care, and the appropriate use of ES.
Downloads
References
1. Videira PA. Avaliação da perceção dos utentes do ACeS Nordeste face à reorganização dos serviços de urgência [dissertation]. Bragança: Escola Superior de Tecnologia e Gestão, Instituto Politécnico de Bragança; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10198/10505
2. Justo AR. Caracterização e análise das admissões hospitalares na urgência do Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, EPE: um estudo com os utentes inscritos no Agrupamento de Centros de Saúde de Lisboa Central [dissertation]. Lisboa: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; 2015. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/16278
3. Oliveira A. Urgência básica [Basic emergency]. Acta Med Port. 2006;19(4):269-73. Portuguese
4. Sá AB. Urgência hospitalar e cuidados de saúde primários: mitos e falácias [Hospital emergency services and primary health care: myths and fallacies]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2002;18(5):347-8. Portuguese
5. Novo LS. A procura de cuidados de saúde no distrito de Viana do Castelo [dissertation]. Porto: Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto; 2010. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10216/45398
6. Aires A, Ferreira A, Santos A, Gonçalves R. Patologia aguda nos cuidados de saúde primários: um estudo transversal descritivo da realidade numa USF [Acute disease in primary health care: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis in a Portuguese family health unit]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2021;37(1):16-26. Portuguese
7. Missão para os Cuidados de Saúde Primários. Consulta aberta: consulta de agudos, não programada versus consulta aberta no hospital e centro de saúde. Lisboa: Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde; 2007.
8. Dixe MA, Passadouro R, Peralta T, Ferreira C, Lourenço G, Sousa PM. Determinants of non-urgent emergency department use. Rev Enf Referência. 2018;IV(16):41-50.
9. Rocovich C, Patel T. Emergency department visits: why adults choose the emergency room over a primary care physician visit during regular office hours? World J Emerg Med. 2012;3(2):91-7.
10. Gomes MM. O perfil do utilizador abusivo dos serviços de urgência portugueses: um estudo no Hospital de São João [dissertation]. Porto: Escola Superior de Saúde, Instituto Politécnico do Porto; 2014. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.22/4546
11. Cortez AC. Utilização das urgências hospitalares e acesso aos cuidados de saúde primários: o impacto da implementação das USF na procura dos serviços de urgência (estudo preliminar) [dissertation]. Lisboa: Escola Nacional de Saúde Pública, Universidade Nova de Lisboa; 2009. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10362/4359
12. Carret ML, Fassa AG, Kawachi I. Demand for emergency health service: factors associated with inappropriate use. BMC Health Serv Res. 2007;7:131.
13. Backman AS, Lagerlund M, Svensson T, Blomqvist P, Adami J. Use of healthcare information and advice among non-urgent patients visiting emergency department or primary care. Emerg Med J. 2012;29(12):1004-6.
14. Carret ML, Fassa AC, Domingues MR. Inappropriate use of emergency services: a systematic review of prevalence and associated factors. Cad Saude Publ. 2009;25(1):7-28.
15. Uscher-Pines L, Pines J, Kellermann A, Gillen E, Mehrotra A. Deciding to visit the emergency department for non-urgent conditions: a systematic review of the literature. Am J Manag Care. 2013;19(1):47-59.
16. Ramos AA, Proença I, Magalhaes J, Grijo L, Beirao L, Peixoto MJ, et al. Caracterização das consultas abertas [Walk-in appointments: a cross-sectional descriptive analysis in a Portuguese family health unit]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2018;34(6):361-9. Portuguese
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.