The incidence of adverse reactions to influenza vaccines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v18i1.9864Keywords:
Vaccine, Anti-influenza vaccine, Influenza, FarmacovigilanceAbstract
To compare the prevalence of Adverse Drug Reactions (ADRs) profile of two anti-Influenza Virus Vaccines Groups, a prospective study was peformed between September and December 1999 in an ambulatory population of three General Practicioners of the Centre of Portugal, using a validated questionnaire designed to study systemic and local ADRs, to be answered at day five after the intra-muscular vaccination. A total of 346 (55,8%) questionnaires has been returned, showing a good adherence to the study, with no statistical difference in the number of questionnaires between the two groups of vaccines in appraisal. At least one ADR was referred in 25,5% of the questionnaires. Of the total ADRs assigned 41% were related to systemic reactions. In Group 1 (attenuated virus vaccines) 30,7% of the questionnaires presented an ADR and in Group 2 (surface antigen vaccines) 22.3% presented ADR, these figures representing no statistical difference. No statistically significant differences of ADR prevalence was observed between the two groups of vaccines, the figures of the prevalence of ADRs being low. Systemic ADRs were more prevalent than the local reactions. Taking into account the satisfactory adhesion of the immunized population, these studies can be helpful in the assessment of the safety of the use of drugs.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.