Reasons for clinical encounter in General Practice/Family Medicine in 2010 in Central Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i4.11108Keywords:
Primary Health Care, Family Practice, Office visitAbstract
Objectives: To characterize the reasons for consultation in primary care as coded by family physicians. Study design: Descriptive, cross-sectional. Setting: District of Coimbra, Portugal. Participants: Patients visiting health centres in the Coimbra district in 2010. Methods: This study examined 453,388 reasons for consultation recorded in primary care in the district of Coimbra during the year 2010. They were coded using the International Classification for Primary Care, second edition (ICPC-2). Descriptive statistics were obtained using PAWS v19 statistical software. Results: The most frequent reasons for consultation recorded were “general and unspecified” (39.8%), “musculoskeletal system” (9, 9%) and “circulatory system” (8.7%). The most commonly recorded components were “signs and symptoms” (30.8%), “diagnostic and preventive procedures” (20.0%) and “test results” (19.3%). The most frequent signs and symptoms symptoms recorded were “cough” (5.6%), “signs and symptoms in the lumbar region” (4.2%), “signs/symptoms of the throat” (3.5%) and “fever” (3.5%). Conclusions: General and unspecified conditions were found to be the most common reason for consultation in this populationDownloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.
