Early detection of developmental dysplasia of the hip: An evidence-based review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v22i2.10228Keywords:
Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip, Congenital Dislocation of the Hip, Screening, Diagnosis, UltrasonographyAbstract
Introduction: The developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is the most frequent pathology in children. An early detection of DDH is very important to prevent invasive interventions. DDH screening strategies are still controversial. Objectives: To perform a review based on the evidence of when, to whom and how to make an early detection of DDH and to define the follow-up based on the results. Methodology: A research was conducted based on the MEDLINE database of: randomized clinical trials (RCT), meta-analysis, and cohort and case-control studies until July of 2005. The remarks of two systematic reviews were also analysed: American Academy of Paediatrics and Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care. The articles were evaluated by significance levels based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy. A total of 83 articles were included in the review. Results: Three DDH early detections were benchmarked: clinical exam, selective ultrasonography (US) and universal US. Only two RCT studies were conducted, and no significant statistical differences were detected. Discussion: The DDH detection clinical exam must be carried-out to all newborns and during the infant periodical vigilance (recommendation B). Female gender, positive family history for DDH and birth pelvic presentation are risk factors to be considered in case the physical exam results turn out to be negative or doubtful (recommendation A). Conclusions: An evidence based decision algorithm is hereby proposed. Other studies, namely more RCTs that compare the effectiveness of the three defined strategies should be conducted.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.