The length of the consultation in primary care is not an indicator of quality: What changed between 1997 and 2005?

Authors

  • Eunice Carrapiço USF Marginal ACES de Cascais
  • Vítor Ramos USF Marginal ACES de Cascais

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v25i6.10698

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2009-11-01

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 6 (2009): Revista Portuguesa de Clínica Geral

Section

Reading Club

License

The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.

The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.

 

How to Cite

The length of the consultation in primary care is not an indicator of quality: What changed between 1997 and 2005?. (2009). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 25(6), 706-7. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v25i6.10698

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>