Severe iatrogenic adverse drug reaction reports: Results of the activity of the Regional Pharmacovigilance unit of central Portugal

Authors

  • Diogo Mendes Mestre em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Centro de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde - Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Centro - AIBILI
  • Carlos Alves Mestre em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Centro de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde - Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Centro - AIBILI; Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade de Coimbra; Centro de Investigação em Ciências da Saúde - Universidade
  • Francisco Batel Marques da Beira Interior
  • Licenciado em Ciências Farmacêuticas. Doutor em Ciências Farmacêuticas, na especialidade de Farmácia Clínica. Centro de Avaliação de Tecnologias de Saúde - Unidade de Farmacovigilância do Centro - AIBILI; Faculdade de Farmácia da Universidade
  • de Coimbra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i1.10915

Keywords:

Drug Surveillance, Postmarketing, Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems, Adverse effects, Causality

Abstract

SEVERE IATROGENIC ADVERSE DRUG REACTION REPORTS: RESULTS OF THE ACTIVITY OF THE REGIONAL PHARMACOVIGILANCE UNIT OF CENTRAL PORTUGAL Objectives: This study aims to characterize the adverse drug reactions (ADR) reported to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Unit of Central Portugal (UFC), to document the contribution of reports of ADR by health professionals to pharmacovigilance in Portugal, and to identify the new knowledge produced by the activity of the UFC. Type of study: Cross-sectional. Setting: Regional Pharmacovigilance Unit of Central Portugal. Population: Spontaneous reports from the geographic area corresponding to the Health Administration of the Central Region of Portugal. Methods: Spontaneous reports (SR) of ADR received in the UFC between January 2001 and August 2011 were included. Causality was assessed using the global introspection method. Severity was assessed according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. Previous description of an ADR was assessed by consulting the Summary of Product Characteristics. Suspected drugs were classified in categories according to the Portuguese Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin. Suspected drugs were classified in categories according to the Bulletin. ADR were classified according to the MedDRA dictionary. Results:The UFC received 1846 SR of ADR between 2001 and August 2011. 999 met the inclusion criteria. We identified 149 (14.9%) unknown ADR and 428 (42.8%) serious ADR. 70 (7.0%) ADR were simultaneously unknown and serious and 41 (4.1%) simultaneously unknown, serious, and certain or probable. Physicians reported 577 (57.8%) ADR, of which 340 (34.0%) were reported by family physicians. Pharmacists reported 354 (35.4%) ADR and nurses 66 (6.6%). Conclusions: Unknown ADR (149; 14.9%), unknown and serious ADR (70; 7.0%) and unknown serious certain or probable ADR (41; 4.1%) received by the UFC show that SR are of great value in increasing knowledge about the safety profiles of drugs

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-01-01

How to Cite

Severe iatrogenic adverse drug reaction reports: Results of the activity of the Regional Pharmacovigilance unit of central Portugal. (2012). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 28(1), 34-40. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i1.10915

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 > >>