New guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes from the directorate general of health: A critical review

Authors

  • Carla Gouveia Médica de família, Unidade de Saúde Familiar LoureSaudável, Centro de Saúde de Loures, Lisboa
  • Mónica Granja Médica de família, Centro de Saúde da Senhora da Hora, Matosinhos
  • Armando Brito De Sá Médico de família, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Rodrigues Miguéis, Lisboa; Professor do Instituto de Medicina Preventiva da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa
  • Luís Filipe Gomes Médico de família, Centro de Saúde de Lagoa; Professor Auxiliar Convidado do Mestrado Integrado de Medicina da Universidade do Algarve
  • José Augusto Simões Médico de família, Unidade de Saúde Familiar Marquês de Marialva, Cantanhede; Professor da Escola Superior de Saúde da Universidade de Aveiro
  • Rosa Gallego Médica de família, Unidade de Cuidados de Saúde Personalizados deVila Franca de Xira; Núcleo de Diabetes da Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i4.10958

Keywords:

Diabetes, Gestational, Screening, Diagnosis, Disease Management, Clinical Protocols

Abstract

The new guidelines from the Portuguese Directorate General of Health (DGH) for gestational diabetes (GD) recommend changes in the screening, treatment and follow-up of GD. We discuss the scientific basis for these guidelines and their poten- tial implications for improvements in health, costs, the use of health service resources and their potential impact on the new- ly diagnosed population of pregnant women. No references cited by the DGH support the diagnosis of GD based on fasting plasma glucose levels above 92 mg/dL at the first prenatal appointment. Using the new cutoff point for the diagnosis of GD for an oral glucose tolerance test performed between 24 and 28 weeks pregnancy results in a tenfold increase in the prevalence of GD, leading to increased allocation of health services resources for management and follow up. A review of the literature reveals no benefit from universal prenatal screening as opposed to selective screening of pregnant women with known risk factors (grade of Recommendation B and level of evidence 3A). Cost-effectiveness studies also favour selective screening over universal screening. Treatment of women newly diagnosed with GD has not shown a reduction in perinatal morbidity, as predicted by the HAPO study. Potential adverse effects of this approach have not been assessed. It would probably be wise to keep the new guideline on hold and return to the previous protocol of GD screening until more robust evidence supports changes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-07-01

How to Cite

New guidelines for the diagnosis and management of gestational diabetes from the directorate general of health: A critical review. (2012). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 28(4), 304-12. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i4.10958

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 > >>