The medical cost of USF Ramada patients’ absences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i1.13104

Keywords:

Patients' absences, Costs and cost analysis

Abstract

Objectives: To correlate the absences of patients of the USF Ramada to the appointments scheduled in 2019 and their associated medical costs.

Study: Retrospective observational.

Location: USF Ramada.

Population: USF Ramada scheduled medical appointments in 2019.

Methods: The sample was calculated from the number of vacancies for medical appointments scheduled in 2019 at the USF Ramada. A sample of 1,000 consultations was randomly selected. The data were analyzed by descriptive tests, binomial tests to correlate the biosocial variables with the number of absences and the assigned appointment duration, and a bi-varied analysis and variances analysis to establish homogeneity between the groups of patients evaluated per doctor. The medical cost of patients' absences was calculated.

Results: One hundred and twenty-eight absences (12.8%) were assessed. The average age was 45.09 years (SD=21.6), 57% of whom were female patients. There was no statistically significant difference between the two genders for the number of absences (p=0.133) or for the lost appointment duration (p=0.500). The average number of absences for each doctor was 13.2% (SD=3.89). The total loss of appointment time was 2,440 minutes, which on average corresponds to 271.11 minutes (SD=18.87) per doctor and 19.06 minutes (SD=5.67) per appointment. Homogeneity was established between each doctor’s group of patients who were absent for sex (p=0.471), age (p=0.778), and appointment duration (p=0.609). The calculated medical cost of patients' absences was 770.2 euros.

Conclusions: It was estimated for 2019 at USF Ramada an avoidable cost between 18,418.82 e 32,169.42 euros for patients' absences from scheduled appointments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde. Utentes do SNS: perguntas frequentes (FAQ). Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2013 [updated 2013 Mar 1; cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www2.acss.min-saude.pt/Portals/0/CTH%20FAQ%20Utentes.pdf

Ministério das Finanças. Orçamento do Estado 2020: relatório dezembro 2019 [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério das Finanças; 2019. Available from: https://arquivo.pt/wayback/20211119134139/https://www.oe2020.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Relatorio-Orcamento-do-Estado-2020.pdf?

Ministério da Saúde. Acesso a cuidados de saúde nos estabelecimentos do SNS e entidades convencionadas em 2019: relatório anual [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2020. Available from: https://www.sns.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Relatorio_Anual_Acesso_2019.pdf

Ministério da Saúde. Relatório e contas do Ministério da Saúde e do Serviço Nacional de Saúde 2018: relatório anual [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2019. Available from: http://www.acss.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Relatorio_Contas_MS-SNS_2018.pdf

Pereira A, Nunes C, Botelho H, Biscaia JL, Barbosa M, Oliveira M, et al. Avaliação de custos-consequências das USF B e UCSP 2015: unidades funcionais dos CSP como centros de resultados [Internet]. Lisboa: Serviço Nacional de Saúde; 2018. Available from: https://ds4.sns.gov.pt/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/CNCSP-Avalia%C3%A7%C3%A3o_USF-1.pdf

Costa C, Santana R, Lopes S. Custos e preços na saúde: passado, presente e futuro. Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos; 2013. ISBN 978-989-8424-99-0

Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde, IP. Tabela de remunerações da carreira médica [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2013 [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www2.acss.min-saude.pt/Portals/0/Tabela%20remunerat%C3%B3ria_rev_101215.pdf

Sindicato Independente dos Médicos. Tabelas salariais 2019. Lisboa: SIM; 2019 [cited 2020 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.simedicos.pt/fotos/editor2/ficheiros/tabela_salarial_2019.pdf

Published

2023-03-07

How to Cite

The medical cost of USF Ramada patients’ absences. (2023). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 39(1), 9-18. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i1.13104