Palliative care literacy assessment in non-health professionals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i1.13390Keywords:
Health literacy, Palliative care, Palliative medicineAbstract
Introduction: Health literacy is becoming increasingly important in health policies worldwide. It is crucial to develop tools to measure literacy levels in palliative care.
Objectives: The main objective was to determine the level of knowledge of non-health professionals regarding palliative care. As a secondary objective, we aimed to develop and validate a tool to measure palliative care literacy among non-health professionals.
Methods: An online inquiry was developed and directed to non-health professionals, covering demographic, professional, and academic characteristics and dichotomic questions on the concept, objective, and palliative care-specific treatments.
Results: A total of 560 inquiries were analysed. Participants considered themselves to have a low level of knowledge of palliative care (4.38±2.17), but they showed a mean number of right questions higher than the median value in every dimension. Positive, moderate, and very significant positive correlations were found on own perception of the level of knowledge on palliative care in the three dimensions of the literacy scale: care focus (r=0.373; p<0.001); care process (r=0.410; p<0.001); concept (r=0.328; p<0.328). The three dimensions showed good internal consistency and global homogeneity.
Discussion: Despite the low level of knowledge about palliative care among the participants, this population showed several correct answers above the median value in each dimension. This can be explained by the high academic level of the participants.
Conclusion: This tool is an important step in the characterization of health literacy in palliative care in Portugal, allowing the identification of education gaps that might motivate an urgent intervention and development of specific health policies.
Downloads
References
1. Despacho n. 3721/2019, de 3 de abril. Diário da República. II Série;(66).
2. Comissão Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos. Plano estratégico para o desenvolvimento dos cuidados paliativos: biénio 2017-2018. Lisboa: CNCP; 2017.
3. Bevan JL, Pecchioni LL. Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(3):356-64.
4. Noonan K, Horsfall D, Leonard R, Rosenberg J. Developing death literacy. Prog Palliat Care. 2016;24(1):31-5.
5. Pestana MH, Gageiro JN. Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. 2ª ed. Lisboa: Sílabo; 2003.
6. Palliative Care Australia. National palliative care standards [Internet]. 5th ed. Canberra: PCA; 2018. Available from: https://palliativecare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2018/11/PalliativeCare-National-Standards-2018_Nov-web.pdf
7. Cherny N, Fallon M, Kaasa S, Portenoy RK, Currow DC, editors. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015. ISBN 9780191765896
8. Scottish Partnership for Palliative Care. Scottish palliative care guidelines [homepage]. Healthcare Improvement Scotland; 2023. Available from: https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/scottish-palliative-care-guidelines/
9. O’Reilly A. Palliative and end of life care. Nurs Stand. 2016;30(51):64-5.
10. Dixe MA, Santo ID, Lopes S, Catarino H, Duarte S, Querido A, et al. Knowledge and myths about palliative care among the general public and health care professionals in Portugal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4630.
11. Pedro AR, Amaral O, Escoval A. Literacia em saúde, dos dados à ação: tradução, validação e aplicação do European Health Literacy Survey em Portugal [Health literacy, from data to action: translation, validation and application of the European Health Literacy Survey in Portugal]. Rev Port Saude Publica. 2016;34(3):259-75. Portuguese
12. Ribeiro O, Lima S, Duarte J. Literacia em saúde em cuidados paliativos [Literacy in health in palliative care]. Millenium. 2020;2(special no. 5):281-92. Portuguese
13. Hirai K, Kudo T, Akiyama M, Matoba M, Shiozaki M, Yamaki T, et al. Public awareness, knowledge of availability, and readiness for cancer palliative care services: a population-based survey across four regions in Japan. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(8):918-22.
14. Hawley P. Barriers to access to palliative care. Palliat Care. 2017;10:1178224216688887.
15. Gomes B, Sarmento VP, Ferreira PL, Higginson IJ. Preferências e locais de morte em regiões de Portugal em 2010 [Internet]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde da Universidade de Coimbra; 2013. Available from: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/9711250/Prefer_ncias_e_Locais_de_Morte_FINAL.pdf
16. Alto Comissariado da Saúde. Plano nacional de saúde 2011-2016: visão, modelo conceptual e estratégia de elaboração [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. Available from: https://pns.dgs.pt/files/2010/07/Documento-Estrategico-PNS-2011-20161.pdf
17. Reed E, Todd J, Lawton S, Grant R, Sadler C, Berg J, et al. A multi-professional educational intervention to improve and sustain respondents’ confidence to deliver palliative care: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018;32(2):571-80.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.