Palliative care literacy assessment in non-health professionals

Authors

  • Mariana Coimbra MD, Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Condestável, ULS da Região de Leiria. Leiria, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8888-7675
  • Maria dos Anjos Dixe PhD, Associated Professor. Center for Innovative Care and Health Technology (ciTechCare), Politécnico de Leiria. Leiria, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9035-8548
  • Pedro Neves Tavares MD, Assistente Hospitalar de Medicina Interna. ULS da Região de Leiria. Leiria, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1113-9628
  • Marília Dourado MD, PhD, Associated Professor. Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra. Coimbra, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5003-4722

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i1.13390

Keywords:

Health literacy, Palliative care, Palliative medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Health literacy is becoming increasingly important in health policies worldwide. It is crucial to develop tools to measure literacy levels in palliative care.

Objectives: The main objective was to determine the level of knowledge of non-health professionals regarding palliative care. As a secondary objective, we aimed to develop and validate a tool to measure palliative care literacy among non-health professionals.

Methods: An online inquiry was developed and directed to non-health professionals, covering demographic, professional, and academic characteristics and dichotomic questions on the concept, objective, and palliative care-specific treatments.

Results: A total of 560 inquiries were analysed. Participants considered themselves to have a low level of knowledge of palliative care (4.38±2.17), but they showed a mean number of right questions higher than the median value in every dimension. Positive, moderate, and very significant positive correlations were found on own perception of the level of knowledge on palliative care in the three dimensions of the literacy scale: care focus (r=0.373; p<0.001); care process (r=0.410; p<0.001); concept (r=0.328; p<0.328). The three dimensions showed good internal consistency and global homogeneity.

Discussion: Despite the low level of knowledge about palliative care among the participants, this population showed several correct answers above the median value in each dimension. This can be explained by the high academic level of the participants.

Conclusion: This tool is an important step in the characterization of health literacy in palliative care in Portugal, allowing the identification of education gaps that might motivate an urgent intervention and development of specific health policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Despacho n. 3721/2019, de 3 de abril. Diário da República. II Série;(66).

2. Comissão Nacional de Cuidados Paliativos. Plano estratégico para o desenvolvimento dos cuidados paliativos: biénio 2017-2018. Lisboa: CNCP; 2017.

3. Bevan JL, Pecchioni LL. Understanding the impact of family caregiver cancer literacy on patient health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2008;71(3):356-64.

4. Noonan K, Horsfall D, Leonard R, Rosenberg J. Developing death literacy. Prog Palliat Care. 2016;24(1):31-5.

5. Pestana MH, Gageiro JN. Análise de dados para ciências sociais: a complementaridade do SPSS. 2ª ed. Lisboa: Sílabo; 2003.

6. Palliative Care Australia. National palliative care standards [Internet]. 5th ed. Canberra: PCA; 2018. Available from: https://palliativecare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2018/11/PalliativeCare-National-Standards-2018_Nov-web.pdf

7. Cherny N, Fallon M, Kaasa S, Portenoy RK, Currow DC, editors. Oxford textbook of palliative medicine. 5th ed. Oxford University Press; 2015. ISBN 9780191765896

8. Scottish Partnership for Palliative Care. Scottish palliative care guidelines [homepage]. Healthcare Improvement Scotland; 2023. Available from: https://rightdecisions.scot.nhs.uk/scottish-palliative-care-guidelines/

9. O’Reilly A. Palliative and end of life care. Nurs Stand. 2016;30(51):64-5.

10. Dixe MA, Santo ID, Lopes S, Catarino H, Duarte S, Querido A, et al. Knowledge and myths about palliative care among the general public and health care professionals in Portugal. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(13):4630.

11. Pedro AR, Amaral O, Escoval A. Literacia em saúde, dos dados à ação: tradução, validação e aplicação do European Health Literacy Survey em Portugal [Health literacy, from data to action: translation, validation and application of the European Health Literacy Survey in Portugal]. Rev Port Saude Publica. 2016;34(3):259-75. Portuguese

12. Ribeiro O, Lima S, Duarte J. Literacia em saúde em cuidados paliativos [Literacy in health in palliative care]. Millenium. 2020;2(special no. 5):281-92. Portuguese

13. Hirai K, Kudo T, Akiyama M, Matoba M, Shiozaki M, Yamaki T, et al. Public awareness, knowledge of availability, and readiness for cancer palliative care services: a population-based survey across four regions in Japan. J Palliat Med. 2011;14(8):918-22.

14. Hawley P. Barriers to access to palliative care. Palliat Care. 2017;10:1178224216688887.

15. Gomes B, Sarmento VP, Ferreira PL, Higginson IJ. Preferências e locais de morte em regiões de Portugal em 2010 [Internet]. Coimbra: Centro de Estudos e Investigação em Saúde da Universidade de Coimbra; 2013. Available from: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/ws/portalfiles/portal/9711250/Prefer_ncias_e_Locais_de_Morte_FINAL.pdf

16. Alto Comissariado da Saúde. Plano nacional de saúde 2011-2016: visão, modelo conceptual e estratégia de elaboração [Internet]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. Available from: https://pns.dgs.pt/files/2010/07/Documento-Estrategico-PNS-2011-20161.pdf

17. Reed E, Todd J, Lawton S, Grant R, Sadler C, Berg J, et al. A multi-professional educational intervention to improve and sustain respondents’ confidence to deliver palliative care: a mixed-methods study. Palliat Med. 2018;32(2):571-80.

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Palliative care literacy assessment in non-health professionals. (2025). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 41(1), 42-51. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i1.13390