Crisis management during the pandemic: a quality improvement work about the approach to new cases using Trace COVID-19

Authors

  • André Melícia Médico Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Alcais, ULS Lisboa Ocidental. Alcabideche, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-0008
  • Sara Figueira Médica Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Alcais, ULS Lisboa Ocidental. Alcabideche, Portugal.
  • Ana Sofia Vitorino Médica Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Alcais, ULS Lisboa Ocidental. Alcabideche, Portugal.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i1.13486

Keywords:

COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Contact tracing, Primary health care, Pandemic

Abstract

Introduction: Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, primary healthcare physicians have been monitoring people suspected of or infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus through the Trace COVID-19® online platform. By the end of January 2021, during the third wave of this pandemic, the available human resources at a family health unit became insufficient for the number of cases being followed at Trace COVID-19®. This resulted in a delay of more than two days in making the first medical contact with newly infected patients.

Methods: Quasi-experimental study, pre- and post-intervention, without a control group, carried out in a family health unit. The initial assessment took place in the first week of February. The execution rate and the total number of hours until the first medical contact was calculated. We established two post-intervention evaluation periods, immediate and late, in the second and fourth weeks of February, respectively. The primary outcome was the rate of newly infected people contacted within 24 hours after introduction to Trace COVID-19®. Quality standard: Insufficient < 50%; Good 5-80%; Very good > 80%. For data analysis, we used Microsoft Excel®.

Results: In the initial assessment, we found 148 new cases. Of these, only 12.8% were contacted within the first 24 hours after the positive result. In the immediate post-intervention period, there were 82 new infections, of which 85.7% were contacted in less than 24 hours. In the late post-intervention period, all newly infected people were contacted on the same day, corresponding to 100% efficacy in making the first contact within 24 hours.

Conclusion: Implementing the protocol improved the medical team’s work and resulted in the achievement of the previously defined goals. Clear priorities and the execution of simple measures can increase efficacy and improve health outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Direção-Geral da Saúde. Abordagem das pessoas com suspeita ou confirmação de COVID-19: norma nº 004/2020, de 23/03/2020, atualizada em 21/04/2022. Lisboa: DGS; 2022.

2. Serviço Nacional de Saúde. Trace COVID-19 [homepage]. Lisboa: Serviços Partilhados do Ministério da Saúde; 2020 [cited 2022 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.spms.min-saude.pt/2019/05/trace-covid-19/

3. Serviço Nacional de Saúde. Plataforma Autoreport e Trace COVID-19 [homepage]. Lisboa: Ministério da Saúde; 2020 Dec 17 [cited 2022 Feb 18]. Available from: https://www.sns.gov.pt/noticias/2020/12/17/plataforma-autoreport-e-trace-covid-19/

4. Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. Lancet Infect Dis. 2020;20(5):533-4.

5. Hu P, Lamontagne P. Internet of Things based contact tracing systems. Sensors (Basel). 2021;21(21):7124.

6. Reintjes R. Lessons in contact tracing from Germany. BMJ. 2020;369:m2522.

7. Weller J, Boyd M, Cumin D. Teams, tribes and patient safety: overcoming barriers to effective teamwork in healthcare. Postgrad Med J. 2014;90(1061):149-54.

Published

2025-03-05

How to Cite

Crisis management during the pandemic: a quality improvement work about the approach to new cases using Trace COVID-19. (2025). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 41(1), 18-25. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i1.13486