Non-reactive VDRL in secondary syphilis: a clinical case of prozone phenomenon?

Authors

  • Rita Ribau Médica Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Santa Joana. Aveiro, Portugal.
  • Inês Rua Médica Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Salinas. Cacia, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1922-7315
  • Elsa Martins Médica Assistente Graduada de Medicina Geral e Familiar. USF Santa Joana. Aveiro, Portugal. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8876-9866

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i4.13549

Keywords:

Sexually transmitted disease, Secondary syphilis, Non-reactive VDRL, Prozone phenomenon

Abstract

Introduction: Syphilis is a sexually transmitted infection caused by the bacterium Treponema pallidum. Syphilis is preventable and treatable and can present several manifestations, depending on its stage – primary, secondary, or latent. The prozone phenomenon is a rare situation in which, due to an excess of antibodies in secondary syphilis, the VDRL presents a false-negative qualitative result. This clinical case aims to raise awareness of the existence of this phenomenon and the importance of clinical sense.

Case description: A 44-year-old male patient, with no relevant history, went to an acute illness appointment due to cutaneous lesions spread over the face, chest, back, and upper limbs with one month of evolution, associated with systemic arthralgias, myalgias, weight loss sensation, axillary adenopathy and frontal headaches, bilateral tearing and tinnitus. In the anamnesis, the patient refers to an episode in the emergency department, about five months ago, due to the appearance of a painless penile lesion, which has been medicated with antibiotic therapy with subsequent resolution. It also mentions the practice of unprotected sex. In front of the suspicion of syphilis, in the secondary phase, blood tests were requested, which surprisingly revealed non-reactive VDRL and, in addition, significant liver changes. Given the unpredictable evolution of the diagnostic procedure, the patient was sent to the emergency department, where the diagnosis of secondary syphilis was confirmed by VDRL, TPHA reactivity, and anti-Treponema pallidum antibodies.

Comment: This case demonstrates the importance of prioritizing clinical sense over-diagnose examinations which, due to its contradictory result, could have altered the medical conduct and, ultimately, the latency in the diagnosis and orientation of the patient, with potentially long-term complications, namely the development of tertiary syphilis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

World Health Organization. Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) [homepage]. Geneva: WHO; 2023 Jul 10. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/sexually-transmitted-infections-(stis)

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Syphilis: annual epidemiological report for 2018 [homepage]. Stockholm: ECDC; 2020. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/syphilis-annual-epidemiological-report-2018

Cherneskie T, editor. An update and review of the diagnosis and management of syphilis [Internet]. New York: New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene; 2006. Available from: https://www.nycptc.org/x/Syphilis_Module_Online.pdf

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum /syphilis) [Internet]. Geneva: WHO; 2016. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/249572/9789241549806-eng.pdf

Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(2)187-209.

Avelleira JC, Bottino G. Syphilis: diagnosis, treatment and control. An Bras Dermatol. 2006;81(2):111-26.

Jespers V, Stordeur S, Desomer A, Carville S, Jones C, Lewis S, et al. Diagnosis and management of gonorrhoea and syphilis. Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre; 2019.

Secretaria de Vigilância em Saúde. Manual técnico para diagnóstico da sífilis [homepage]. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2016. Available from: https://portaldeboaspraticas.iff.fiocruz.br/biblioteca/manual-tecnico-para-diagnostico-da-sifilis/

Nayak S, Acharjya B. VDRL test and its interpretation. Indian J Dermatol. 2012;57(1):3-8.

Peeling RW, Ye H. Diagnostic tools for preventing and managing maternal and congenital syphilis: an overview. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(6):439-46.

Soreng K, Levy R, Fakile Y. Serologic testing for syphilis: benefits and challenges of a reverse algorithm. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 2014;36(24):195-202.

Published

2024-09-16

How to Cite

Non-reactive VDRL in secondary syphilis: a clinical case of prozone phenomenon?. (2024). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 40(4), 394-400. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i4.13549