Duration of the consultation: perspectives of doctors and patients
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v18i5.9889Keywords:
Length/Duration of Consultation, Patient-Physician RelationshipAbstract
Objectives: To characterise the length (time duration) of consultations conducted by eight general practitioners on five consecutive days, and the corresponding subjective perception by patients. To compare doctors and patients opinions regarding the length of consultation and the reasons given by either for both long and short consultations. Type of Study: Descriptive, cross-sectional. Setting: Five outposts of the Odivelas Health Centre (urban environment). Population: 274 consultations corresponding to eight physicians and 274 patients. Methods: A self-applied questionnaire was given to the doctors and patients. Questionnaires were filled out at the Health Centre premises at the end of each appointment. Results: Average length of consultation was 14.4 minutes, and average length as perceived by patients was 17.7 minutes. Doctors found consultation length adequate in 80.7% of cases, and patients did so in 96.4% of cases. No patients found the consultation too long. Most patients (74.4%) did not find that the doctors appointment with the previous patients was too long. Conclusions: In this sample, physicians were more critical of consultation length than patients. Patients seldom made negativeremarks concerning the doctors performance.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.