The role of the family doctor in the care of single-parent families
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v41i4.14097Palavras-chave:
Single-parent families, Family medicine, Family doctor, Medical trainingResumo
Objective: To understand family doctors’ (FD) and family doctor residents' (FDR) perspectives on the health care of single-parent families (SPF).
Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using a convenience sample. After validation, an anonymous online questionnaire was distributed to FD and FDR between January and March 2024. Two contextual variables were collected, as well as five questions regarding the views of FD and FDR on “The impact of living in a single-parent family” and seven questions about “The medical practice in the single-parent family”. Descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed. A n=31 representative sample was calculated.
Results: For n=47, 88.6%, there was agreement that single parents present poorer mental health, and 81.1%, n=43, expressed the need for more training on SPF, also agreeing that the formation of an SPF is a moment of increased need for medical attention, n=36, 67.9%. FD and FDR, who expressed the need for more training, were more likely to disagree that their medical training was sufficient to provide satisfactory care for SPF, p=0.003. Doctors seemed to know when to refer SPF to other qualified professionals, n=37, 69.8%.
Discussion: The small sample size and the different inherent biases of self-reported data studies are to be mentioned. No other Portuguese studies exist on this subject; the fulfilment of the FD’s and FDR’s populational role seems to depend on the skills that are to be learned and practiced in continuous medical knowledge and development. More studies on this topic are needed.
Conclusion: FD and FDR consider it important to intervene in the needs of SPF and do not feel fully prepared to provide satisfactory care for these families.
Downloads
Referências
1. Goldstein S, Naglieri JA, editors. Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Boston: Springer; 2011. ISBN 9780387790619
2. Correia IM. Famílias monoparentais: uma família, um caso... [Single-parent families: a family, a case]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2002;18(4):241-9. Portuguese
3. Macedo AF, Pereira AT, Madeira N. Psicologia na medicina. Lisboa: LIDEL; 2018. ISBN 9789897523489
4. Tomčíková Z, Veselská ZD, Gecková AM, van Dijk JP, Reijneveld SA. Adolescents' drinking and drunkenness more likely in one-parent families and due to poor communication with mother. Cent Eur J Public Health. 2015;23(1):54-8.
5. Hemovich V, Crano WD. Family structure and adolescent drug use: an exploration of single-parent families. Subst Use Misuse. 2009;44(14):2099-113.
6. Thompson SJ, Auslander WF, White NH. Comparison of single-mother and two-parent families on metabolic control of children with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(2):234-8.
7. Duriancik DM, Goff CR. Children of single-parent households are at a higher risk of obesity: a systematic review. J Child Health Care. 2019;23(3):358-69.
8. Troxel WM, Lee L, Hall M, Matthews KA. Single-parent family structure and sleep problems in black and white adolescents. Sleep Med. 2014;15(2):255-61.
9. Crandall CJ, Karlamangla AS, Merkin SS, Binkley N, Carr D, Greendale GA, et al. Adult bone strength of children from single-parent families: the Midlife in the United States Study. Osteoporos Int. 2015;26(3):931-42.
10. Moncrief T, Beck AF, Simmons JM, Huang B, Kahn RS. Single parent households and increased child asthma morbidity. J Asthma. 2014;51(3):260-6.
11. Kim GE, Kim EJ. Factors affecting the quality of life of single mothers compared to married mothers. BMC Psychiatry. 2020;20(1):169.
12. Van de Velde S, Bambra C, Van der Bracht K, Eikemo TA, Bracke P. Keeping it in the family: the self-rated health of lone mothers in different European welfare regimes. Sociol Health Illn. 2014;36(8):1220-42.
13. Kong KA, Choi HY, Kim SI. Mental health among single and partnered parents in South Korea. PLoS One. 2017;12(8):e0182943.
14. Chiu M, Rahman F, Vigod S, Lau C, Cairney J, Kurdyak P. Mortality in single fathers compared with single mothers and partnered parents: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2018;3(3):e115-e23.
15. Cohen S, Murphy ML, Prather AA. Ten surprising facts about stressful life events and disease risk. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019;70:577-97.
16. Turner AI, Smyth N, Hall SJ, Torres SJ, Hussein M, Jayasinghe SU, et al. Psychological stress reactivity and future health and disease outcomes: a systematic review of prospective evidence. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2020;114:104599.
17. LeMoult J, Humphreys KL, Tracy A, Hoffmeister JA, Ip E, Gotlib IH. Meta-analysis: exposure to early life stress and risk for depression in childhood and adolescence. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59(7):842-55.
18. Park C, Rosenblat JD, Brietzke E, Pan Z, Lee Y, Cao B, et al. Stress, epigenetics and depression: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019;102:139-52.
19. Calcia MA, Bonsall DR, Bloomfield PS, Selvaraj S, Barichello T, Howes OD. Stress and neuroinflammation: a systematic review of the effects of stress on microglia and the implications for mental illness. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016;233(9):1637-50.
20. Rebelo L. A família em medicina geral e familiar: conceitos e práticas. Coimbra: Almedina; 2018. ISBN 9789724073132
21. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Hardcastle KA, Sethi D, Butchart A, Mikton C, et al. The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Public Health. 2017;2(8):e356-66.
22. Brady D, Burton LM, editors. The Oxford handbook of the social science of poverty. Oxford University Press; 2016. ISBN 9780190459604
23. Borgmann LS, Rattay P, Lampert T. Alleinerziehende eltern in Deutschland: der zusammenhang zwischen sozialer Unterstützung und psychosozialer gesundheit [Single parents in Germany: the interrelation between social support and mental health]. Gesundheitswesen. 2019;81(12):977-85. German
24. Nieuwenhuis R, Maldonado LC. The triple bind of single-parent families: resources, employment and policies to improve wellbeing. Policy Press; 2018. ISBN 9781447333654
25. Saito T, Shibata M, Hirabayashi N, Honda T, Morisaki Y, Anno K, et al. Family dysfunction is associated with chronic pain in a community-dwelling Japanese population: the Hisayama study. Eur J Pain. 2023;27(4):518-29.
26. Rigo II, Bós ÂJ. Disfunção familiar em nonagenários e centenários: importância das condições de saúde e suporte social [Family dysfunction in nonagenarians and centenarians: the importance of health conditions and social support]. Cien Saude Colet. 2021;26(6):2355-64. Portuguese
27. Alves E, Silva S, Martins S, Barros H. Family structure and use of prenatal care. Cad Saude Publica. 2015;31(6):1298-304.
28. Bispo RM, Santiago LM, Rosendo I, Simões JA. Risco familiar, classificação socioeconómica e multimorbilidade em medicina geral e familiar em Portugal [Family risk, socioeconomic classification and multimorbidity in general and family medicine in Portugal]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2022;38(2):149-56. Portuguese
29. Instituto Nacional de Estatística. O que nos dizem os censos sobre estruturas familiares [homepage]. Lisboa: INE; 2023 Jan 24 [cited 2024 Mar 24]. Available from: https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_boui=66321126&PUBLICACOESmodo=2&xlang=pt
30. Simões JA, Prazeres F, Maricoto T, Simões PA, Lourenço J, Romano JP, et al. Physician empathy and patient enablement: survey in the Portuguese primary health care. Fam Pract. 2021;38(5):606-11.
31. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 7th ed. New York: Pearson; 2018. ISBN 9780134790541
32. Monteiro M, Santiago LM, Simões JA. Patient-Doctor Depth of Relationship Scale validation and its influence on the outcomes: what is the importance of emotional intelligence when approaching the patient? Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2024;40(2):112-22.
33. Allen J, Gay B, Crebolder H, Heyrman J, Svab I, Ram P, et al. The European definition of general practice/family medicine [homepage]. WONCA Europe; 2023 Jul 3 [updated 2023 Aug 15]. Available from: https://www.woncaeurope.org/kb/european-definition-gp-fm-2023
34. Berge SD, Meland E, Brekke M, Bondevik GT, Thuen F, Mildestvedt T. Couple relationship problems-a task for the general practitioner? A cross-sectional survey from Norway. Fam Pract. 2021;38(2):115-20.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2025 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os autores concedem à RPMGF o direito exclusivo de publicar e distribuir em suporte físico, electrónico, por meio de radiodifusão ou em outros suportes que venham a existir o conteúdo do manuscrito identificado nesta declaração. Concedem ainda à RPMGF o direito a utilizar e explorar o presente manuscrito, nomeadamente para ceder, vender ou licenciar o seu conteúdo. Esta autorização é permanente e vigora a partir do momento em que o manuscrito é submetido, tem a duração máxima permitida pela legislação portuguesa ou internacional aplicável e é de âmbito mundial. Os autores declaram ainda que esta cedência é feita a título gratuito. Caso a RPMGF comunique aos autores que decidiu não publicar o seu manuscrito, a cedência exclusiva de direitos cessa de imediato.
Os autores autorizam a RPMGF (ou uma entidade por esta designada) a actuar em seu nome quando esta considerar que existe violação dos direitos de autor.
