Varicella vaccine in children

Authors

  • Ana Garrido Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar - USF Lidador (ACES Maia)
  • Clara Pinto Ferreira Interna de Medicina Geral e Familiar - USF Horizonte (ULS Matosinhos)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i2.10928

Keywords:

Chickenpox vaccine, Infant, Child, Preschool

Abstract

VARICELLA VACCINE IN CHILDREN Objectives: To review the available evidence for varicella vaccination in healthy children, analyzing its effectiveness and safe- ty. Data sources: MEDLINE database and evidence-based medicine websites. Methods: A search was conducted for guidelines, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and original studies, published between January 2005 and November 2009, in English, Portuguese and Spanish, using the MeSH terms chickenpox vaccine, infant, child preschool and child. The SORT (Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy) scale of the American Family Physician was applied to evaluate the level of evidence. Results: We found 14 studies that assessed vaccine effectiveness: 5 guidelines (2 with strength of recommendation A) 3 sys- tematic reviews (2 with evidence level 1), one meta-analysis (evidence level 1), a case-control study and 4 cohort studies. Stud- ies showed that the vaccine has an effectiveness of 70 to 90% in preventing all forms of varicella and 95 to 100% in prevent- ing moderate to severe disease, over a period not exceeding ten years. The two-dose regimen showed greater long-term effec- tiveness than the single dose regimen. Two studies evaluating vaccine safety concluded that the vaccine is safe and well toler- ated (one randomized controlled trial with evidence level 1). Conclusion: Varicella vaccine is effective and safe in healthy children (Strength of Recommendation A). However, its imple- mentation should be universal, to allow a high coverage rate, considering the possibility of a two-dose regimen.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2012-03-01

How to Cite

Varicella vaccine in children. (2012). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 28(2), 116-24. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v28i2.10928