Reasons for encounter in general practice: evolutionary trend in the last decade in Central Portugal
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v38i4.13148Keywords:
Reasons for encounter, ICPC-2, Primary care, General practiceAbstract
Objective: Analyse the reasons for encounters, classified in chapters using ICPC-2 (International Classification for Primary Care – 2) by general practitioners in the Central Region of Portugal between 2010 and 2018.
Methods: Cross-sectional observational study of the reasons for encounter classified by general practitioners from three primary health centres clusters in the area of the Regional Health Centre Administration, randomly selected, in 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, and 2018. We obtained anonymized data organized by gender, year, the total number of consultations, number of consultations with ICPC-2 classification as the reason for encounter, and the ICPC-2 chapters recorded, calculating the dynamics and growth.
Results: In a total of 12.569.898 consultations performed, 5.3% were the reason for encounter classified. The ICPC-2 top-ranked chapters in all years of study were, in descending order, A (15.4%), L (11.3%), D (10.3%), R (8.4%), S (9.7%), and K (7.9%). The lowest ranked chapters in all years of study were, in increasing order, Z (1.6%), Y (1.7%), B (1.9%), W (2.1%), H (2.9%), and N (3.7%). Chapter Z recorded the highest growth dynamics from 2010 to 2018 (∆=+1.15).
Discussion: In a decade of socio-economic problems, the reasons for encounters classified using ICPC-2 remained unchanged. Classifying reasons for encounter, even if it is replete with quality and volume problems can help in the quality and result of the consultation these results being like what is found in the literature.
Conclusion: ICPC-2 classification of reasons for consultation by general practitioners was verified in 5.3% of consultations, and the chapters were invariable over time. Chapter Z registered the highest trends by volume of classification.
Downloads
References
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund. A vision for primary health care in the 21st century: towards universal health coverage and the Sustainable Development Goals [homepage]. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/328065
Allen J, Gay B, Crebolder H, Heyrman J, Svab I, Ram P, et al. A definição europeia de medicina geral e familiar (clínica geral/medicina familiar) [The European definition of family medicine (general practice/family medicine)]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2005;21(5):511-6. Portuguese
Santos I, Ramos V, Envia G, Bettencourt AL, Ornelas M, Spencer E, et al. Perfil de competências do especialista em medicina geral e familiar [homepage]. Lisboa: Ordem dos Médicos; 2019. Available from: https://ordemdosmedicos.pt/perfil-de-competencias-do-especialista-em-medicina-geral-e-familiar/
olde Hartman TC, van Ravesteijn H, Lucassen P, van Boven K, van Weel-Baumgarten E, van Weel C. Why the ‘reason for encounter’ should be incorporated in the analysis of outcome of care. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(593):e839-41.
Bentzen N, Bridges-Webb C. An international glossary for general/family practice. Fam Pract. 1995;12(3):267.
Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered medicine: transforming the clinical method. 3rd ed. CRC Press; 2017. ISBN 9781138447271
Granja M. Os registos dos médicos de família estão em perigo [Family practice records are in danger]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2018;34(1):33-9. Portuguese
Granja M, Outeirinho C. Registo médico orientado por problemas em medicina geral e familiar: atualização necessária [Problem-oriented medical record in family practice: a necessary update]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2018;34(1):40-4. Portuguese
Weed LL. Medical records that guide and teach. N Engl J Med. 1968;278(11):593-600.
Pinto D. Classificar motivos de consulta e procedimentos com a ICPC na prática clínica? [Classifying reasons for encounter and procedures with ICPC in clinical practice?]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2012;28(4):247-8. Portuguese
Granja M. Impressos para motivos de consulta e acções de formação médica sobre identificação de motivos de consulta: serão eficazes? [Teaching about the reasons for consultation: is it effective?]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2006;22(5):653-4. Portuguese
Rodrigues JG. Porque consultam os utentes o seu médico de família? [Why do patients consult their family doctor?]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2000;16(6):442-52. Portuguese
Barreiro D, Santiago LM. Motivos de consulta em medicina geral e familiar no distrito de Coimbra no ano de 2010 [Reasons for clinical encounter in general practice/family medicine in 2010 in Central Portugal]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2013;29(4):236-43. Portuguese
Magalhães AR, Penetra J, Pereira C, Carvalho R, Neto MG, Santiago LM. Caracterização do perfil dos grandes utilizadores de uma Unidade de Saúde Familiar [Profile of the frequent attenders at a Family Health Unit]. Rev ADSO. 2016;4(6):15-21. Portuguese
Santiago LM, Reis AF, Botas PC, Pereira CD. Medicina centrada no paciente e capacitação do consulente medicina geral e familiar [Patient-centered medicine and enablement in the general practice/family medicine setting]. Rev ADSO. 2015;3(5):19-32. Portuguese
WONCA. Classificação Internacional dos Cuidados de Saúde Primários, 2ª edição, ICPC-2E V4.4 PT [Internet]. Lisboa: Administração Central do Sistema de Saúde; 2016. Available from: http://www.acss.min-saude.pt/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/1_ICPC_2_4_4_VF.pdf
Pinto D, Corte-Real S. Codificação com a Classificação Internacional de Cuidados Primários (ICPC) por internos de medicina geral e familiar [International Classification for Primary Care (ICPC) coding by family medicine trainees]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2010;26(4):370-82. Portuguese
Soler JK, Okkes I, Oskam S, van Boven K, Zivotic P, Jevtic M, et al. An international comparative family medicine study of the Transition Project data from the Netherlands, Malta and Serbia: is family medicine an international discipline? Comparing incidence and prevalence rates of reasons for encounter and diagnostic titles of episodes of care across populations. Fam Pract. 2012;29(3):283-98.
Chueiri PS, Gonçalves MR, Hauser L, Wollmann L, Mengue SS, Roman R, et al. Reasons for encounter in primary health care in Brazil. Fam Pract. 2020;37(5):648-54.
Moth G, Olesen F, Vedsted P. Reasons for encounter and disease patterns in Danish primary care: changes over 16 years. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2012;30(2):70-5.
Aboulghate A, Abel G, Lyratzopoulos G, Abdelmohsen A, Hamed AR, Roland M. Patterns of disease presentation and management in Egyptian primary care: findings from a survey of 2458 primary care patient consultations. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:161.
Rahman SM, Angeline RP, Cynthia S, David K, Christopher P, Sankarapandian V, et al. International Classification of Primary Care: an Indian experience. J Fam Med Prim Care. 2014;3(4):362-7.
Tandjung R, Hanhart A, Bärtschi F, Keller R, Steinhauer A, Rosemann T, et al. Referral rates in Swiss primary care with a special emphasis on reasons for encounter. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015;145:w14244.
Santiago LM. Contributo para a melhoria dos registos em consulta. Rev Ordem Médicos. 2015;31(161):60-2.
Pinto D. O que classificar nos registos clínicos com a Classificação Internacional de Cuidados Primários? [What should we code in health records with the International Classification of Primary Care?]. Rev Port Clin Geral. 2014;30(5):328-34. Portuguese
Coelho IL, Sousa-Uva M, Pina N, Marques S, Matias-Dias C, Rodrigues AP. Crise económica em Portugal: evolução da incidência de depressão e correlação com o desemprego {Economic crisis in Portugal: trajectory of the incidence of depression and correlation with unemployment]. Acta Med Port. 2021;34(4):278-82. Portuguese
Teixeira V, Macedo AM, Borges C, Carrapa S, China S, Cunha R. O impacto do nível socioeconómico na acessibilidade aos cuidados de saúde primários: estudo em quatro unidades de saúde do Norte de Portugal [Socioeconomic status and access to primary health care: a cross-sectional study in four health units in Northern Portugal]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2016;32(6):376-86. Portuguese
Portaria no 64-C/2016, de 31 de março. Diário da República. Série I;(63 Suppl 3).
Nunes JM, Yaphe J, Santos I. Sintomas somatoformes em medicina de família: um estudo descritivo da incidência e evolução em uma unidade de saúde familiar de Portugal [Somatoform symptoms in family medicine: a descriptive study of incidence and outcome in a family health center in Portugal]. Rev Bras Med Fam Com. 2013;8(28):164-71. Portuguese
Pordata. Taxa de desemprego: total e por sexo (%) [homepage]. Pordata; 2021 [updated 2022 Jul 4]. Available from: https://www.pordata.pt/Portugal/Taxa+de+desemprego+total+e+por+sexo+(percentagem)-550
Portaria nº 45/2015, de 20 de fevereiro. Diário da República. Série I;(36).
Portella E, Juncosa S, Carrillo E, Bolibar B. Motivos de consulta y problemas activos: una clave para la comprensión de la información en atención primaria [A reason for encounter and problems: a key for the comprehension of information in primary care]. Gac Sanit. 1992;6(32):216-9. Spanish
Melo M. O uso da ICPC nos registos clínicos em medicina geral e familiar [The use of ICPC in clinical records in general practice]. Rev Port Med Geral Fam. 2012;28(4):245-6. Portuguese
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.
