Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus: inertia vs adherence to therapy

Authors

  • Maria João Gomes da Silva Gonçalves USF Garcia de Orta
  • Clara Fonseca Assistente Graduada de Medicina Geral e Familiar na USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental
  • Inês Pintalhão Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar da USF Garcia de Orta, ACes Porto Ocidental
  • Rodrigo Costa Interno de Formação Específica de Medicina Geral e Familiar da USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental
  • Ana Calafate Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar da USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental
  • Manuel Henriques Assistente de Medicina Geral e Familiar da USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i1.13494

Keywords:

Type 2 diabetes, Therapeutics, Therapeutic inertia, Therapeutic compliance

Abstract

Background: In Portugal, the rate of non-control of patients with diabetes is around 35%. Among the causes described as barriers to achieving the goals in the control of diabetic patients, therapeutic inertia and therapeutic compliance stand out.

Objectives: Calculate the proportion of patients with uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) at the USF Garcia de Orta and analyze the glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values distribution. Calculate the proportion of therapeutic compliance and therapeutic inertia in uncontrolled patients and check for possible associated factors.

Methods: Cross-sectional analytical study. Population: diabetic patients enrolled and monitored at USF Garcia de Orta (N=988). A simple random sample was selected, and calculated for a statistical significance of 0.05, an expected control rate of 40%, and a precision of 4% (n=375).

Results: The sample consisted of 367 diabetic patients with a mean age of 70 years, of which 52% were men. The proportion of patients with uncontrolled DM was 38.1% [95%CI (33.3-43.2%)]. To assess adherence to therapy, the study of the subgroup was used (n=140). It was found that 19.7% [95%CI (13.0-26.5%)] of uncontrolled patients have poor adherence to therapy and this is associated with worse HbA1c values. For therapeutic inertia, the subgroup of patients with two consecutive values ​​of HbA1c ³7% (n=114) was analyzed. The therapeutic inertia was 39.5% [95%CI (33.5-43.2%)], which is lower for higher HbA1c values. Besides HbA1c no association was found between adherence and therapeutic inertia with the other variables studied.

Conclusion: Poor adherence and therapeutic inertia are obstacles to achieving higher control rates in patients with DM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Maria João Gomes da Silva Gonçalves, USF Garcia de Orta

    Interna de Formação Especifica de Medicina Geral e Familiar na USF Garcia de Orta, ACeS Porto Ocidental

References

Observatório Nacional da Diabetes. Relatório anual da diabetes: factos e números 2019. Lisboa: Sociedade Portuguesa de Diabetologia; 2020.

Cardoso SM, Rodrigues E, Valadas C, Fonseca C, TEDDI CP investigators. Metabolic control and therapeutic profile of patients with diabetes in Portuguese primary care (TEDDI CP). Prim Care Diabetes. 2015;9(3):172-8.

López-Simarro F, Brotons C, Moral I, Cols-Sagarra C, Selva A, Aguado-Jodar A, et al. Inercia y cumplimiento terapéutico en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2 en atención primaria [Inertia and treatment compliance in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care]. Med Clin. 2012;138(9):377-84. Spanish

Davies MJ, D'Alessio DA, Fradkin J, Kernan WN, Mathieu C, Mingrone G, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018: a consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care. 2018;41(12):2669-701.

López-Simarro F, Moral I, Aguado-Jodar A, Cols-Sagarra C, Mancera-Romero J, Alonso-Fernández M, et al. Impacto de la inercia terapéutica y del grado de adherencia al tratamiento en los objetivos de control en personas con diabetes [The impact of therapeutic inertia and the degree of the medication adherence on the control goals for patients with diabetes]. Semergen. 2018;44(8):579-85. Spanish

Khunti K, Davies MJ. Clinical inertia-time to reappraise the terminology? Prim Care Diabetes. 2017;11(2):105-6.

Majeed A, Rehman M, Hussain I, Imran I, Saleem MU, Saeed H, et al. The impact of treatment adherence on quality of life among type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: findings from a cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021;15:475-81.

American Diabetes Association. Glycemic targets: standards of medical care in diabetes—2021. Diabetes Care. 2021;44(Suppl 1):S73-S84.

López-Simarro F, Brotons C, Moral I, Aguado-Jodar A, Cols-Sagarra C, Miravet-Jiménez S. Concordance between two methods in measuring treatment adherence in patients with type 2 diabetes. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016;10:743-50.

Schmittdiel JA, Uratsu CS, Karter AJ, Heisler M, Subramanian U, Mangione CM, et al. Why don’t diabetes patients achieve recommended risk factor targets? Poor adherence versus lack of treatment intensification. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(5):588-94.

Published

2023-03-07

How to Cite

Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus: inertia vs adherence to therapy. (2023). Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice, 39(1), 22-8. https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v39i1.13494

Most read articles by the same author(s)