Transgender sexual and reproductive health: a systematic review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i4.13937Palavras-chave:
Family planning, Reproductive health, Primary health care, Transgender personsResumo
Background: The right to access safe and high-quality sexual and reproductive healthcare is part of the well-being of all people. There is a scarcity of clinical guidelines regarding transgender (TG) specific family planning.
Objective: This synthesis of information intends to describe the approach towards the TG population’s sexual health.
Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in the MEDLINE and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. The quality of retrieved studies was assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme Qualitative Checklist for qualitative studies and an adapted version of the Quality Assessment Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies. The protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022371962).
Results: From the 671 articles retrieved, 13 fulfilled the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and were selected to perform the in-depth analysis. Phenomena of interest were subdivided into patient and provider-level issues, contraception, fertility preservation, and cancer screening. Contraception can have many purposes, including the prevention of pregnancy, and frequently exerts an impact on gender dysphoria. A great percentage of TG patients believe that testosterone may be used as a contraceptive method, which prevents recognition of their pregnancy risk. Providers’ lack of formal education plus the discrimination TG people face contribute to the rising of myths and misinformation among the population. Most TG people desire to be parents, but the question of whether biologically or not is mostly undefined. TG people do not routinely undertake pelvic examinations or PAP smears.
Conclusion: The present review outlines the urge to develop guidelines for TG sexual and reproductive health. Primary care doctors are vital in managing TG people’s health concerns.
Downloads
Referências
World Health Organization. Sexual health, human rights and the law. Geneva: WHO; 2015.
Bonnington A, Dianat S, Kerns J, Hastings J, Hawkins M, De Haan G, et al. Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Contraceptive counseling for transgender and gender diverse people who were female sex assigned at birth. Contraception. 2020;102(2):70-82.
Davidson M. Seeking refuge under the umbrella: inclusion, exclusion, and organizing within the category Transgender. Sex Res Social Policy. 2007;4:60.
Van Caenegem E, Wierckx K, Elaut E, Buysse A, Dewaele A, Van Nieuwerburgh F, et al. Prevalence of gender nonconformity in Flanders, Belgium. Arch Sex Behav. 2015;44(5):1281-7.
Calderon-Cifuentes PA. Trans discrimination in Europe: a TGEU analysis of the FRA LGBTI survey 2019 [homepage]. TGEU; 2021. Available from: https://tgeu.org/tgeu-report-on-trans-discrimination-in-europe/
Herman JL, Flores AR, O’Neill KK, et al. How many adults and youth identify as transgender in the United States? [homepage]. UCLA School of Law; 2022. Available from: https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/trans-adults-united-states/
European Parliament. Sexual and reproductive health and rights in the EU, in the frame of women’s health – P9_TA(2021)0314 [homepage]. European Parliament; 2021 Jun 24. Available from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2021-0314_EN.html
Direção-Geral da Saúde. Estratégia de saúde para as pessoas lésbicas, gays, bissexuais, trans e intersexo – LGBTI. Vol. 1: promoção da saúde das pessoas trans e intersexo [Internet]. Lisboa: DGS; 2019. Available from: https://apmgf.pt/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/i025699.pdf
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71.
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. CASP qualitative checklist [Internet]. Oxford: CASP; 2018. Available from: https://casp-uk.net/images/checklist/documents/CASP-Qualitative-Studies-Checklist/CASP-Qualitative-Checklist-2018_fillable_form.pdf
National Institutes of Health. Quality assessment tool for observational cohort and cross-sectional studies [homepage]. London: NIH; 2021 Jul. Available from: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools
Haley SG, Tordoff DM, Kantor AZ, Crouch JM, Ahrens KR. Sex education for transgender and non-binary youth: previous experiences and recommended content. J Sex Med. 2019;16(11):1834-48.
Beswick A, Corkum M, D’Souza D. Locally advanced cervical cancer in a transgender man. CMAJ. 2019;191(3):E76-8.
Bentsianov S, Gordon L, Goldman A, Jacobs A, Steever J. Use of Copper intrauterine device in transgender male adolescents. Contraception. 2018;98(1):74-5.
Shires DA, Stroumsa D, Jaffee KD, Woodford MR. Primary care clinicians’ willingness to care for transgender patients. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(6):555-8.
Agénor M, Cottrill AA, Kay E, Janiak E, Gordon AR, Potter J. Contraceptive beliefs, decision making and care experiences among transmasculine young adults: a qualitative analysis. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020;52(1):7-14.
Forsberg H, Eliason MJ. Healthcare providers’ pregnancy prevention counseling of trans and non-binary assigned female at birth (TNB/AFAB) patients. J Homosex. 2022;69(2):356-83.
Nahata L, Chen D, Quinn GP, Travis M, Grannis C, Nelson E, et al. Reproductive attitudes and behaviors among transgender/nonbinary adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2020;66(3):372-4.
Cipres D, Seidman D, Cloniger C 3rd, Nova C, O'Shea A, Obedin-Maliver J. Contraceptive use and pregnancy intentions among transgender men presenting to a clinic for sex workers and their families in San Francisco. Contraception. 2017;95(2):186-9.
Stark B, Hughto JM, Charlton BM, Deutsch MB, Potter J, Reisner SL. The contraceptive and reproductive history and planning goals of trans-masculine adults: a mixed-methods study. Contraception. 2019;100(6):468-73.
Reynolds CA, Charlton BM. Sexual behavior and contraceptive use among cisgender and gender minority college students who were assigned female at birth. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2021;34(4):477-83.
Gomez AM, Đỗ L, Ratliff GA, Crego PI, Hastings J. Contraceptive beliefs, needs, and care experiences among transgender and nonbinary young adults. J Adolesc Health. 2020;67(4):597-602.
Light A, Wang LF, Zeymo A, Gomez-Lobo V. Family planning and contraception use in transgender men. Contraception. 2018;98(4):266-9.
Vyas N, Douglas CR, Mann C, Weimer AK, Quinn MM. Access, barriers, and decisional regret in pursuit of fertility preservation among transgender and gender-diverse individuals. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(4):1029-34.
Tishelman AC, Sutter ME, Chen D, Sampson A, Nahata L, Kolbuck VD, et al. Health care provider perceptions of fertility preservation barriers and challenges with transgender patients and families: qualitative responses to an international survey. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(3):579-88.
Rahman M, Li DH, Moskowitz DA. Comparing the healthcare utilization and engagement in a sample of transgender and cisgender bisexual+ persons. Arch Sex Behav. 2019;48(1):255-60.
Chen D, Kolbuck VD, Sutter ME, Tishelman AC, Quinn GP, Nahata L. Knowledge, practice behaviors, and perceived barriers to fertility care among providers of transgender healthcare. J Adolesc Health. 2019;64(2):226-34.
Fix L, Durden M, Obedin-Maliver J, Moseson H, Hastings J, Stoeffler A, et al. Stakeholder perceptions and experiences regarding access to contraception and abortion for transgender, non-binary, and gender-expansive individuals assigned female at birth in the U.S. Arch Sex Behav. 2020;49(7):2683-702.
Deutsch MB. Guidelines for the primary and gender-affirming care of transgender and gender nonbinary people [homepage]. 2nd ed. San Francisco: University of California-UCSF Transgender Care; 2016 Jun 17. Available from: https://transcare.ucsf.edu/guidelines
Weiselberg E. Menstrual considerations for transgender male and gender diverse adolescents who were assigned female at birth. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2022;52(8):101239.
Becerra Pérez MM, Menear M, Brehaut JC, Légaré F. Extent and predictors of decision regret about health care decisions: a systematic review. Med Decis Making. 2016;36(6):777-90.
Wierckx K, Van Caenegem E, Pennings G, Elaut E, Dedecker D, Van de Peer F, et al. Reproductive wish in transsexual men. Hum Reprod. 2012;27(2):483-7.
Semlyen J, Kunasegaran K. Understanding barriers to cervical screening uptake in trans men: an exploratory qualitative analysis. Lancet. 2016;388 Suppl:104.
Direção-Geral da Saúde. Diagnóstico e estadiamento do cancro invasivo do colo do útero: norma n.º 018/2012, de 21/12/2012. Lisboa: DGS; 2012.
Santé Publique France. Baromètre santé 2010 [homepage]. Santé Publique France; 2016 Sep 27. Available from: https://www.santepubliquefrance.fr/etudes-et-enquetes/barometres-de-sante-publique-france/barometre-sante-2010
Subramaniam A, Fauci JM, Schneider KE, Whitworth JM, Erickson BK, Kim K, et al. Invasive cervical cancer and screening: what are the rates of unscreened and underscreened women in the modern era? J Low Genit Tract Dis. 2011;15(2):110-3.
Van Doorslaer E, Masseria C, Koolman X. Inequalities in access to medical care by income in developed countries. CMAJ. 2006;174(2):177-83.
Giffort DM, Underman K. The relationship between medical education and trans health disparities: a call to research. Sociol Compass. 2016;10(11):999-1013.
Van Gerwen OT, Jani A, Long DM, Austin EL, Musgrove K, Muzny CA. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections and human immunodeficiency virus in transgender persons: a systematic review. Transgend Health. 2020;5(2):90-103.
Marshall Z, Welch V, Minichiello A, Swab M, Brunger F, Kaposy C. Documenting research with transgender, nonbinary, and other gender diverse (trans) individuals and communities: introducing the Global Trans Research Evidence Map. Transgend Health. 2019;4(1):68-80.
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar

Este trabalho encontra-se publicado com a Licença Internacional Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial-SemDerivações 4.0.
Os autores concedem à RPMGF o direito exclusivo de publicar e distribuir em suporte físico, electrónico, por meio de radiodifusão ou em outros suportes que venham a existir o conteúdo do manuscrito identificado nesta declaração. Concedem ainda à RPMGF o direito a utilizar e explorar o presente manuscrito, nomeadamente para ceder, vender ou licenciar o seu conteúdo. Esta autorização é permanente e vigora a partir do momento em que o manuscrito é submetido, tem a duração máxima permitida pela legislação portuguesa ou internacional aplicável e é de âmbito mundial. Os autores declaram ainda que esta cedência é feita a título gratuito. Caso a RPMGF comunique aos autores que decidiu não publicar o seu manuscrito, a cedência exclusiva de direitos cessa de imediato.
Os autores autorizam a RPMGF (ou uma entidade por esta designada) a actuar em seu nome quando esta considerar que existe violação dos direitos de autor.