Medical certificates for drivers' licenses: A critique of law Nº. 138/2012
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v29i3.11071Keywords:
Automobile Driving, Accidents, Traffic, Motor Vehicles, Safety, General Practice, Roles, physician’sAbstract
Legislation on medical examinations for obtaining and renewing of drivers' licenses was recently amended by law no. 138/July 5, 2012. It has generated controversy because it 'pushes' family physicians (FP) to issue certificates with specifications that they cannot achieve in a family practice. Patients with health problems managed by their FP will require opinions from other doctors. The evaluation of the fitness to drive of professional drivers and of people with disabilities is not a usual task for FP. Some argue that assessment of fitness to drive is not a health need and should not be covered by the National Health Service. There is a potential for conflict between the different roles played by FP namely between the authority to determine medical fitness to drive and the caregiver role in the context of a doctor-patient relationship. Repeal of the law is proposed. The text should comply with European Community directives without being overzealous. Medical and Psychological Assessment Centers for drivers should be established. In these centers, physicians and other health professionals with necessary expertise and training can conduct driver evaluations uncomplicated by a therapeutic relationship.Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
The authors will assign to the RPMGF the sole right to publish and distribute the content of the manuscript specified in this declaration via physical, electronic, broadcasting or any other medium that may come into existence. They also grant the RPMGF the right to use and exploit this manuscript, in particular by assigning, selling or licensing its content. This permission is permanent and takes effect from the moment the manuscript is submitted, has the maximum duration allowed by applicable Portuguese or international law and is of worldwide scope. The authors further declare that this assignment is made free of charge. If the RPMGF informs the authors that it is not going to publish their manuscript, the exclusive assignment of rights ceases forthwith.
The authors authorise the RPMGF (or any entity it may appoint) to act on their behalf when it believes that copyright may have been infringed.
